Whose Fault Is It Anyway?
A whole town happily trades in rotten fruit until one meal makes people ill. Then everyone knows exactly whom to blame. A sharp parable on scapegoats.

Once there was a shopkeeper who charged a fortune for apples that had gone bad. When the people of his neighbourhood found out, they did not complain. Instead, they praised him, and asked him to sell the rotten potatoes and tomatoes growing on their own farms as well.
Everyone gets a share
Word soon reached the police. Their chief visited the shop and questioned the shopkeeper. The shopkeeper gave him a gift of cherries and promised to sell the rotten onions lying in the officers’ own kitchens. Everyone went home smiling.
When the government officials heard about it, they were furious. They told the shopkeeper to take on staff of their choosing, or face the consequences. He agreed.
Over the years, the little shop grew into a vast shopping mall, staffed by people recommended by the officials, by the police and by the neighbourhood. Everyone was content trading rotten fruit and vegetables.
Then someone falls ill
One day, a girl bought some rotten garlic. She used it in a meal for her guests. It was so rotten that every one of them fell sick. At the hospital, the doctors found rotten vegetables to blame.
As the news spread, the officials blamed the girl and decided to punish her. The police backed them, and called a large press conference to announce that they had caught the real culprit behind the rotten produce in the market. The neighbours threw stones at her house to show how angry they were about rotten fruit. She was punished, and the whole town hailed it as good triumphing over evil.
The story behind the story
The parable was written about a real scandal, in which a student who had topped an exam was exposed as a fraud and arrested, along with others like her. Meanwhile, the system that had sold such results for years, with the help of people in positions of trust, was hardly discussed at all. And many families stood ready to keep paying that system in the years ahead.
It is worth asking, whenever a single person is held up as the villain: who built the shop, who stocked it, and who kept buying? Whose fault is it, really?








